An IT department ran its portfolio across a tracker, spreadsheets and institutional memory, so establishing the state of any project required asking around first. We built a roadmap platform that syncs with Planfix, pushes updates into Microsoft Teams and shows aggregate departmental load. Project decisions are made about 25% faster.
The IT department ran its project portfolio across a task tracker, a set of spreadsheets and the memories of the people involved. Two things followed. Decisions took longer than they should have, because establishing the current state of a project — who owns it, what it is waiting on, what it blocks — required asking around before anyone could decide anything. And departmental capacity was invisible: leadership could see individual projects but could not see how much the department had collectively committed to, which meant new work was accepted on optimism. The department needed a single authoritative roadmap, and it needed updates to reach people without requiring them to open yet another tool.
Projects, milestones and owners live in one place with explicit state, so the current status of any initiative is a lookup rather than a conversation. This is the mechanism behind the decision-speed gain.
Synchronises with the existing Planfix workflow so the roadmap reflects operational reality instead of becoming a parallel truth that drifts from the tracker teams actually use.
Status changes and deadlines are pushed into Teams, where the department already communicates. Adoption of internal tools tends to be decided by this detail: updates that arrive are read, updates that require a visit are not.
An aggregate view of committed work across projects, giving leadership the capacity picture needed to accept or defer new requests deliberately rather than by default.
Project decisions are made about 25% faster, because the state of an initiative is available at the moment the question is asked rather than after a round of enquiries. Leadership gained a view of total departmental load, which changed how new work is accepted — capacity became a visible constraint instead of an after-the-fact discovery. The platform is in production.
Tell us what the process looks like today and we will tell you what can be automated — and what should not be.
LET'S TALK